If you’re the kind of person that can’t hear dissenting opinions without being offended to the point of violent rage, stop reading now. The internet is your oyster and you can have your “beliefs” read back to you in any number of places, most of which you already have bookmarked.
For the rest of you, I’d like to pose a question: Is there one book of advice written thousands of years ago you would trust more than one written more recently?
If you’re about to go under the knife, would you rather your doctor learned from a recent text or from something written in a dead language? Or maybe your child has cancer. Should the doctors adhere to the Galenism embraced in the 1600’s? Subject your child to bloodletting to reestablish their equilibrium? Or would you prefer that doctors follow the best practices of the twenty first century – using tools that couldn’t even be imagined all those years ago?
These are rhetorical questions. I already know your answers. There’s probably no real instance where you’d select an outdated text to a recent one. Heck, you’ll probably update your smart phone next year and the one you have is barely a year old.
You’re not driving a car from 1977 or wearing clothes from 1984. You’re not investing money like it’s 1999 and you’re probably not chain smoking if you’re pregnant, like you may have done anytime before the early 70’s. We’re constantly learning new things and applying them to the important aspects of our life.
So why do so many still base their “spiritual life” on books written thousands of years ago? I’m talking specifically about “holy” books filled with parables and mythologies that many still take literally – as if we learned nothing since they were published.
Truth is we’ve learned a lot since then, including how they were written, rewritten and why. Yet folks still believe these books (and there have been many through the years) are the words of the gods that created everything. Gods that, coincidentally, have a few rules for you to follow, and representatives on Earth that take credit cards.
Alas, knowledge can’t penetrate where it’s not welcome. Ask Bill O’Reilly, who in conversations with David Silverman and Richard Dawkins pointed to changing tides as proof of the existence of God.
“I just don’t think we could have lucked out to have the tides come in, the tides go out, the Sun go up, the Sun go down.” Bill O’Reilly
Of course we do know why the tides go in and out, it’s just that Bill didn’t know, so he points to the sky and says “God did it.” In the same way early shysters pointed to the lightening and said “God is angry. It’s probably something you did.”
Why am I thinking of this stuff? Well, a conversation I overheard recently is stuck in my head. A young girl told her mom she learned that Christ was a Jew. The mother didn’t like this, insisting he was Catholic. A few others chimed in agreeing he was most assuredly Catholic and that Catholicism was, in fact, the first religion. Oy vey.
“Why do so many still base their spiritual life on books written thousands of years ago?”
I was in an awkward position of not wanting to say too much to a child in front of the parents she trusted. So I mumbled one thing or another and concentrated on finishing my beer.
This interaction reminds me that many who feel strongest about religion know the least about it. I don’t believe Christ existed, but I wasn’t about to chime in on that aspect. Nor was I about to explain the difference between Christianity and Catholicism. For me, it was another example of humans relying on this very old book, that very few people have actually read all the way through, instead of applying modern philosophy to child rearing.
And why should they? The same “truths” were told to them, to their parents, their grandparents, and backwards through the endless yawn of history. So of course the enemies of knowing are uninterested in new ideas. They already “know the truth” from these archaic texts, why would they want to hear other explanations. It’s far easier to swallow classical conditioning, even after you’ve learned a fact or two. Just ask a Priest fresh from the seminary where they learn that religious texts are mythologies and not the word of God. While some lose their faith outright, most plow forward, slightly confused about their choices in life and wondering if it’s too late to become an astronaut or join the circus.
“God is angry. It’s probably something you did.”
I’m not suggesting we burn books or ignore ancient texts. I think understanding the evolution of thought is our imperative. But greater minds than yours or mine have been thinking about this stuff for years, it didn’t stop with the publication of anyone’s holy book. If there’s one ray of sunshine, it’s that the overwhelming majority of humans can read these texts without stoning their neighbors or shooting up concert halls. But we know, all too well, that some can only read the blood on the page.
Spirituality is not, as many are led to believe by these old books, limited to supernatural gods, goddesses, karmic possibilities or transcendental rituals. Spirituality can be anything done in the “spirit” of something larger. You can choose non-violent protest in the spirit of Martin Luther King, for example. You can even live your life in the spirit of mythological religious characters without believing they were ever flesh and bone. Just ask a Christian Atheist.
You can literally live in the spirit of anyone and everyone you’ve ever learned something from, not just from one book, or even from one thinker or philosopher. When you can apply the best practices of multiple schools of thought, regardless of – and especially in spite of – your own affiliations, that’s some serious spirituality right there.